They Say I Say

Using templates to enter into the conversation of academic writing is a concept I have never attempted; however, it does offer strategic ways of developing the thought process of the argument. Graff offers key components that will enable the writer to successfully “map some of the voices” (9) within the particular argument, and yet at the same time exact one’s own voice. Interestingly, the suggestion of stating one’s own ideas in academic writing has not always been the case. Until recently students have been urged to delineate the argument devoid of individual opinion. This relatively new idea of bringing “I” into the conversation promotes easier access into the conversation as does the use of templates in academic writing. As I read through the section “Ways of Responding” (8) the templates act as chess pieces -- situated to promote critical thinking skills and help the writer to develop the argument. Although some writers may disagree with the use of templates, I believe these tools are useful in the process of concision. The more cohesive the text, the easier it is for the reader to engage; therefore, Graff’s advocacy of the writer’s template proves worthy while maintaining the individual voice of the writer. It may appear that the template is “training-wheels” for the novice writer; however, if the method has been proven to work, which according to Graff it does, then I’ll ask for the banana seat as well!!